Coraline Review
Henry Selick. This strange movie features characters of all sorts. Coraline (Dakota Fanning) is a smart, courageous, and easily irritated girl. She moves away from all of her friends to Oregon, where her parents further their writing careers. Constantly working, they have no time to entertain Coraline. Until she meets Wybie (Robert Bailey) a goofy, attentive boy who loves all the adventures that Coraline brings along.
Coraline, being the adventurous girl that she is, was always exploring through all of her new surroundings. Playing a game her dad made up for her, she found a small door blocked by bricks from the inside. Giving up her chances of getting inside, she goes to bed. Waking up, she hears a little mouse chirp which led her to the now unblocked door. This leads to an unknown world of all her perfect dreams on her own life. Little does she know this fantasy land is not at all what it portrays itself to be. During her trips back and forth, Coraline see's her new life in a very unrealistic way. Button eyes, and magical gardens, even a talking cat. But soon to realize this wasn't what she wanted at all. Coralines 2nd mom (Teri Hatcher) eventually turns into a horrid woman, trapping her real parents, stopping her from going back to the real world. Being clever, she plays a little game with mother #2 to find her parents and the lost childrens eyes. With hard work and determination, Coraline won the game going back to her normal life.

A lot of time is put into films like this. It is not like a movie with real characters. Every scene is taken by photos that are snapped by every milisecond. 7 seconds of the movie takes about 3 weeks to shoot, due to the charcters face expressions and movement. This is called the stop and go method because every step they take has to be shot. After all scenes are done, it will have take about 4 to 5 years to show one movie. Its the such detail that makes the film so beautiful.

Background of the movie is good. You should put info about stop animation. Links and pics are nice and clear. The summary of the movie was clear. The tone and flow of the article were nice.
ReplyDelete-Justin V
This review seemed to flow really well. Also the movie summary was very detailed and covered what went on in the movie. I think there could have been a little bit more background on the movie. Other than that the tone of the article was consistent throughout the review. Also the links and pictures went well with your review.
ReplyDeleteThere was a lot of background in this review and it flowed great. All of the pictures gave good visuals for the readers too. You had a good amount opinion in as well. There was good summarization of the plot but you didnt really ruin it for the readers who havent seen it. Overall, it was put together well and had good clarity.
ReplyDeleteJoey L
Easy to find how you felt about the movie. It was very entertaining to read and kept my attention. You didn't spoil the end of the movie, which is great. Very nice visually; all the colors on the blog go well. Very well written- no spelling errors or punctution errors.
ReplyDelete